{"object":"determination","schema_version":"1","vendor":"Tableau","state":"conditional","sentence":"Contracting entity depends on your region or order form — read the clause.","qualifier":"","contracting_entity":"Salesforce, Inc. for the Americas other than Brazil and Canada; a separate named Salesforce entity for Brazil, Canada and each EMEA and Asia-Pacific region, per section 12.9 of the Salesforce Main Services Agreement","jurisdiction":"United States (Salesforce, Inc.); Ireland (SFDC Ireland Limited) and a separate country per listed region elsewhere","governing_law":"Depends on the customer's region, per the §12.9 table. Under §12.11 each party agrees to the applicable governing law and to the exclusive jurisdiction of the applicable courts in that table, without regard to choice or conflicts of law rules. By region: Americas other than Brazil or Canada, California and controlling United States federal law, courts of San Francisco, California. Brazil, Brazilian law, São Paulo. Canada, Ontario and controlling Canadian federal law, Toronto. EMEA other than France, Germany, Italy, Spain or the UK, English law, London. France, French law, Paris. Germany, German law, Munich. Italy, Italian law, Milan. Spain, Spanish law, Madrid. United Kingdom, English law, London. APAC other than Australia, India, Japan or New Zealand, Singapore law, Singapore. Australia or New Zealand, New South Wales law and courts. India, Indian law, Bengaluru. Japan, Japanese law, Tokyo.","conditions":["The contracting entity depends on your region or order form: read the clause for your position.","The agreement is under a governing law that depends on where the customer is based."],"us_control":{"status":"region_dependent","finding":"Region-dependent — a US entity contracts in some regions; elsewhere a non-US entity does, and whether a US company controls it is not established","parent":null,"legal_reach":"More than one contracting entity is on record, and which one a buyer signs with depends on facts about the buyer, such as where it is. The record does not establish US corporate control on every track, so it makes no single finding on US legal reach.","caveat":null,"rule":"A provider subject to US jurisdiction can be required by valid US legal process to produce data in its possession, custody or control wherever it is located (CLOUD Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2713). A US-incorporated contracting entity is subject to US jurisdiction. A non-US contracting entity under US corporate control may be within reach through that control, depending on whether the parent controls the data and on the circumstances; where that control has not been established, the entity is not thereby beyond reach.","rule_url":"/static/manifesto.html#us-reach-rule"},"evidence":{"source_url":"https://wp.sfdcdigital.com/tableau/en-us/wp-content/uploads/sites/47/2026/07/Salesforce_MSA_883dd2.pdf","document_title":null,"date_read":"2026-09-20","last_rechecked":{"last_check":"found_again","gate":"readable","date":"2026-10-19","words":"clause re-checked 19 Oct 2026"},"quote":null,"quote_carried_by":"the AI Subprocessor Jurisdiction Report ($299), which quotes the clause each finding rests on"},"not_established":["us_control"]}