Vannus / Catalog / Kong AI Gateway

Kong AI Gateway

Vannus records that this vendor routes across several model providers — not captured by one. Every finding below is quoted to the vendor’s own document, or marked not disclosed where the vendor publishes nothing.

AI gateway built on Kong Gateway and Konnect that governs LLM, MCP and agent-to-agent traffic through a single control point.

infrastructure, AI, enterprise
What the vendor's own documentation says
Connect to any major LLM provider through one consistent API, and switch or combine providers without rewriting your integration.
developer.konghq.com ↗ Vendor-sourcedQuote re-checked 14 Sep 2026
Who controls it
OriginUnited States · terms of service ↗
US corporate controlNot established — our catalogue recorded US control for this vendor, but we hold no document naming a US entity, so the claim is withdrawn until we do. This is a gap in our sourcing, not a finding about this vendor.

Training and retention posture varies by plan. What we publish above describes the vendor’s default plan; enterprise, team and API agreements frequently differ, often materially, and a contract can override the published default entirely. Check your own plan and contract before relying on this row.

This is a separate question from the grade above. The grade measures resilience — whether the tool endures and whether you could leave it. This describes who controls the vendor. A tool can score modestly on one and strongly on the other, and many do.

On U.S. CLOUD Act reach specifically: the statute reaches a provider subject to U.S. jurisdiction over data in its possession, custody or control. Corporate control is a strong indicator of that and it is what we can evidence from published documents — but it is not the whole test. A company founded outside the U.S. can still contract through a U.S. entity or run substantial U.S. operations. Treat this as a starting point for your own review, not a legal determination, and take advice on anything that matters.

Signals on file
Origin
United States

The vendor's published or catalog-recorded posture — the concrete facts this grade is built from. A full audit verifies each against the vendor's current documentation.

How this grade is set

Vannus publishes a nine-dimension trust framework — data sovereignty, training privacy, compliance posture, operational resilience, exit portability, and more. The heaviest criterion asks whether the tool builds its own AI or resells someone else's model; where the vendor discloses it, the grade cites the vendor's own documentation. No paid placements — scoring is walled off from affiliate revenue. See the methodology →

Related tools we grade
Visit Kong AI Gateway ↗ Grade your whole stack →