Vannus / Catalog / Luma AI

Luma AI

Vannus has not established which model this vendor runs, and does not infer one. Every finding below is quoted to the vendor’s own document, or marked not disclosed where the vendor publishes nothing.

Determination
Contracts with Luma AI, Inc. (United States) โ€” within reach of US legal process.
lumalabs.ai · read 2026-09-14
read from terms of service

Text-to-video and image-to-video generation (Dream Machine, Ray series) with a hosted API, aimed at short cinematic clips, b-roll and reference-image animation.

video, generative, creative
What the vendor's own documentation says
We build the models underneath Luma, and frontier research ships straight into the hands of working creatives.
lumalabs.ai ↗ Vendor-sourcedQuote re-checked 14 Sep 2026
Who controls it
Data jurisdictionUnited States · a privacy notice ↗
US corporate controlYes โ€” a US parent or US contracting entity is on the public record ยท clause re-checked 17 Sep 2026
Contracting entityLuma AI, Inc.
Governing lawState of California and the United States without regard to conflicts of laws provisions that would result in the application of the laws of another jurisdiction
Trains on your dataYes, by default โ€” on the vendor's default plan

Training and retention posture varies by plan. What we publish above describes the vendor’s default plan; enterprise, team and API agreements frequently differ, often materially, and a contract can override the published default entirely. Check your own plan and contract before relying on this row.

This is a separate question from the grade above. The grade measures resilience — whether the tool endures and whether you could leave it. This describes who controls the vendor. A tool can score modestly on one and strongly on the other, and many do.

On U.S. CLOUD Act reach specifically: the statute reaches a provider subject to U.S. jurisdiction over data in its possession, custody or control. Corporate control is a strong indicator of that and it is what we can evidence from published documents — but it is not the whole test. A company founded outside the U.S. can still contract through a U.S. entity or run substantial U.S. operations. Treat this as a starting point for your own review, not a legal determination, and take advice on anything that matters.

Signals on file
Data jurisdiction
United States

The vendor's published or catalog-recorded posture — the concrete facts this grade is built from. A full audit verifies each against the vendor's current documentation.

How this grade is set

Vannus publishes a nine-dimension trust framework — data sovereignty, training privacy, compliance posture, operational resilience, exit portability, and more. The heaviest criterion asks whether the tool builds its own AI or resells someone else's model; where the vendor discloses it, the grade cites the vendor's own documentation. No paid placements — scoring is walled off from affiliate revenue. See the methodology →

Related tools we grade
Visit Luma AI ↗ Grade your whole stack →