Graded C+ on resilience. In Vannus's assessment it has not disclosed which model it runs — acceptable, with limits worth knowing.
Ambient AI assistant for clinicians — generates structured clinical notes from the consultation, with dictation and EHR integration. The security page states "All our data is hosted on Google Cloud Platform databases and storage buckets. These databases are located in the region you choose when you create your organization", and that its security programme is certified against SOC 2 Type II and IS
Not disclosed. Nabla does not publish which model it runs, so this criterion is excluded and the grade rests on what we could verify. We say so rather than guess.
This is a separate question from the grade above. The grade measures resilience — whether the tool endures and whether you could leave it. This measures who can compel your data. A tool can score modestly on one and strongly on the other, and many do.
The vendor's published or catalog-recorded posture — the concrete facts this grade is built from. A full audit verifies each against the vendor's current documentation.
Vannus grades Nabla against nine dimensions of trust — data sovereignty, training privacy, compliance posture, operational resilience, exit portability, and more. The heaviest criterion asks whether the tool builds its own AI or resells someone else's model; where the vendor discloses it, the grade cites the vendor's own documentation. No paid placements — scoring is walled off from affiliate revenue. See the methodology →