Graded C on resilience. In Vannus's assessment it has not disclosed which model it runs — acceptable, with limits worth knowing.
Image and vector graphic generation aimed at design teams, with brand style controls and editable SVG output. The privacy policy names Recraft Inc. but publishes no registered address or country, so jurisdiction is recorded as not disclosed. The policy commits that third-party AI providers will not train on customer AI input or output without affirmative authorisation, and that Recraft's own model
Not disclosed. Recraft does not publish which model it runs, so this criterion is excluded and the grade rests on what we could verify. We say so rather than guess.
This is a separate question from the grade above. The grade measures resilience — whether the tool endures and whether you could leave it. This measures who can compel your data. A tool can score modestly on one and strongly on the other, and many do.
The vendor's published or catalog-recorded posture — the concrete facts this grade is built from. A full audit verifies each against the vendor's current documentation.
Vannus grades Recraft against nine dimensions of trust — data sovereignty, training privacy, compliance posture, operational resilience, exit portability, and more. The heaviest criterion asks whether the tool builds its own AI or resells someone else's model; where the vendor discloses it, the grade cites the vendor's own documentation. No paid placements — scoring is walled off from affiliate revenue. See the methodology →