Vannus records that this vendor names one model provider in its own documentation. Every finding below is quoted to the vendor’s own document, or marked not disclosed where the vendor publishes nothing.
In-memory data store used as a cache, message broker and streaming engine. Sub-millisecond reads, optional persistence, and managed hosting via Redis Cloud.
For the LLM, we chose OpenAI's GPT-4o because of its reliability and speed.
Not yet assessed. We publish a sovereignty position only where the vendor documents one — we do not infer it from a domain or a company name.
Redis publishes a list of the other companies it uses to process customer data. It names 34 of them, each shown below with the location the vendor lists it under, in the vendor’s own words.
Taken together those entries name at least Ireland, Israel, Sweden, USA. That is what our place list could match in the vendor’s own words above, so treat it as a floor rather than the whole of it — the entries themselves are the record.
These are other companies, not Redis. Where a sub-processor is listed as operating is a fact about that company. It is not a statement about where Redis keeps your data, which Vannus publishes separately and only from a document in which the vendor says so.
The same document also lists 4 companies in Redis’s own corporate group. Those are the vendor itself rather than onward processors, so they are not among the entries above and are not counted in them.
Read from redis.io on 2026-09-16. Every entry above is a verbatim span of that page.
This is the vendor’s own disclosure, reproduced. Vannus has not audited what any of these companies do with your data, and a list can change without notice. Treat it as a starting point for your own review, not a legal determination, and take advice on anything that matters.
Taken from the vendor’s own published material. Vannus does not hold these reports and has not reviewed their scope or dates — ask the vendor for the current report before relying on any of them.
Vannus publishes a nine-dimension trust framework — data sovereignty, training privacy, compliance posture, operational resilience, exit portability, and more. The heaviest criterion asks whether the tool builds its own AI or resells someone else's model; where the vendor discloses it, the grade cites the vendor's own documentation. No paid placements — scoring is walled off from affiliate revenue. See the methodology →