Unleash
This entry runs no foundation model. Every finding below is quoted to the vendor’s own document, or marked not disclosed where the vendor publishes nothing.
Feature flag management system — enables deterministic traffic routing with user stickiness during Strangler Fig migrations, decoupling deployment from release for fine-grained destructive control
No foundation model. Unleash does not run one, so there is no model provenance to record. Open-source feature management and feature flag platform for progressive rollouts, kill switches, and audit; it exposes an MCP server that the customer's own AI coding assistants call, and runs no foundation model of its own. Reviewed from the vendor’s own documentation: getunleash.io ↗ If that is out of date, tell us at right of reply.
Not yet assessed. We publish a sovereignty position only where the vendor documents one — we do not infer it from a domain or a company name.
Unleash publishes a list of the other companies it uses as sub-processors. It lists 3 entries. Each is shown below with the location the vendor lists it under, in the vendor’s own words.
Unleash marks some of those entries and qualifies them below the table. Its words, kept with the entries because the qualification is part of the answer:
* Note: *AWS Region depends on each customer selection. Options: Europe (Frankfurt) or US-East
Taken together those entries name at least EU, US. That is what our place list could match in the vendor’s own words above, so treat it as a floor rather than the whole of it — the entries themselves are the record.
These are other companies, not Unleash. Where a sub-processor is listed as operating is a fact about that company. It is not a statement about where Unleash keeps your data, which Vannus publishes separately and only from a document in which the vendor says so.
Read from getunleash.io on 2026-09-16, from the page the vendor titles “Subprocessors | Unleash”. Every entry above is a verbatim span of that page.
This is the vendor’s own disclosure, reproduced. Vannus has not audited what any of these companies do with your data, and a list can change without notice. Treat it as a starting point for your own review, not a legal determination, and take advice on anything that matters.
Vannus records, from the vendor's own published documents, the legal entity a customer contracts with, the country that entity sits in, and the governing law of its terms — and whether the vendor runs its own model or resells someone else's. Each finding is quoted to its source and dated, or marked not disclosed where the vendor publishes nothing. No paid placement on a record, in the catalog or in search — affiliate status is walled off from the record, enforced by a test in the build. See the methodology →
Work here and think we got something wrong? Corrections and right of reply → — free, no account, and we publish your response next to our entry.