Vannus / Catalog / Hume AI

Hume AI D Fragile

Graded D on resilience. In Vannus's assessment it has not disclosed which model it runs — single-point-of-failure risk.

Voice generation and emotionally expressive speech APIs (Octave TTS, EVI conversational voice). The privacy policy gives an address of 51 Madison Ave, Floor 31, New York, NY 10010 and states data may be stored and processed in any country where it has facilities or service providers, including the United States. Its developer documentation states that by default anonymised EVI interaction data is

audio, voice, generative
Model provenance

Not disclosed. Hume AI does not publish which model it runs, so this criterion is excluded and the grade rests on what we could verify. We say so rather than guess.

Who controls it
Verified Domestic Infrastructure
OriginUSA
Data jurisdictionUS
Within U.S. CLOUD Act reachYes
Trains on your dataYes, unless you opt out

This is a separate question from the grade above. The grade measures resilience — whether the tool endures and whether you could leave it. This measures who can compel your data. A tool can score modestly on one and strongly on the other, and many do.

Signals on file
Origin
United States
US legal control
Yes — exposed to US CLOUD Act / CFIUS
Training on your data
Trains on your data unless you opt out

The vendor's published or catalog-recorded posture — the concrete facts this grade is built from. A full audit verifies each against the vendor's current documentation.

How this grade is set

Vannus grades Hume AI against nine dimensions of trust — data sovereignty, training privacy, compliance posture, operational resilience, exit portability, and more. The heaviest criterion asks whether the tool builds its own AI or resells someone else's model; where the vendor discloses it, the grade cites the vendor's own documentation. No paid placements — scoring is walled off from affiliate revenue. See the methodology →

Related tools we grade
Visit Hume AI ↗ Grade your whole stack →